[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1111020835080.11087@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 08:37:11 +1100 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] security: Yama LSM
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011, Kees Cook wrote:
> > We probably need to flesh out criteria for inclusion in Yama and document
> > it.
>
> What's the best way for me to help with that documentation?
Perhaps post a basic document for review. It doesn't have to be a novel.
One thing I'd like to see is making it clear that if a feature is nacked
by a core maintainer, Yama is not a means to bypass that nack. That
maintainer will need to ack it as part of Yama, too.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists