[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111102151711.GB12543@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 08:17:11 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ata port runtime power management support
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 02:21:37PM +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> These 3 patches add ata port runtime pm support, which is done through scsi layer.
> scsi host runtime pm mechanism is already there(scsi_pm.c).
> These patches add hooks for ata port.
>
> Lin Ming (3):
> scsi: fix potential dead lock for host runtime pm
> scsi: add hooks for host runtime power management
> ata: implement ata port runtime pm hooks
Hmmm.... Some questions.
* How much does this add on top of hardware timed auto spindown and
dynamic link power management?
* Do the added benefits justify yet another runtime powersaving
mechanism?
* Any way we can tie the other stuff with overall runtime PM?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists