[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF173F9A46E5@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 09:39:21 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
To: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
CC: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Gary King <gking@...dia.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] arm/tegra: add support for tegra30 interrupts
Peter De Schrijver wrote by Wednesday, November 02, 2011 9:38 AM:
> Tegra30 has 1 extra legacy interrupt controller. Use the GIC ITLinesNumber
> field to determine how many interrupt controllers we have and initialize
> appropriately. Also make room for the extra tegra30 interrupts by moving
> the GPIO IRQ base. This shouldn't affect existing code as it determines the
> correct IRQ number for GPIOs using TEGRA_GPIO_TO_IRQ()
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
After fixing one small issue I comment on below,
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
I was previously concerned that renumbering the interrupt IDs would cause
some kind of backwards compatibility problems, but thinking more, I don't
think there's an issue; for a DT-based system, all the IRQ and GPIO numbers
are specified relative to the controller, and the relative numbering isn't
changing here. For a non-DT-based system, any IRQ numbers for any GPIO
should indeed be generated using TEGRA_GPIO_TO_IRQ (or the run-time
equivalent) and hence should also work OK after this patch.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/include/mach/irqs.h b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/include/mach/irqs.h
...
> #define NR_BOARD_IRQS 32
> -
> -#define NR_IRQS (INT_BOARD_BASE + NR_BOARD_IRQS)
> -#endif
> +#define NR_IRQS (INT_BOARD_BASE + NR_BOARD_IRQS)
The indentation change to NR_IRQS seems like a mistake; the existing code
looks OK.
--
nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists