[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EB17A50.6050804@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:13:52 -0400
From: Adam Jackson <ajax@...hat.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
CC: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Treat PCH eDP like DP in most
places
On 11/2/11 12:20 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> @@ -766,10 +766,10 @@ intel_dp_set_m_n(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> continue;
>
> intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
> - if (intel_dp->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT) {
> + if (intel_dp->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT || is_pch_edp(intel_dp)) {
> lane_count = intel_dp->lane_count;
> break;
> - } else if (is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> + } else if (is_cpu_edp(intel_dp)) {
> lane_count = dev_priv->edp.lanes;
> break;
> }
>
> I guess this means we can't trust the BIOS settings for PCH eDP?
Given the choice of trusting DPCD or the VBT, I'd definitely prefer DPCD.
- ajax
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists