[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxKtA0XXtiKgKC5qHmFuTv2=TbuMEczkegJKY4Uy00a-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:46:26 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Simon Kirby <sim@...tway.ca>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc9
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I believe it might come from commit 0e734419
> (ipv4: Use inet_csk_route_child_sock() in DCCP and TCP.)
>
> In case inet_csk_route_child_sock() returns NULL, we dont release socket
> lock.
Hmm. I'm not seeing it. We're not even taking the socket lock there.
Or is it hidden somehow?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists