[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1320256412.2292.17.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:53:32 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Simon Kirby <sim@...tway.ca>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc9
Le mercredi 02 novembre 2011 à 10:46 -0700, Linus Torvalds a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > I believe it might come from commit 0e734419
> > (ipv4: Use inet_csk_route_child_sock() in DCCP and TCP.)
> >
> > In case inet_csk_route_child_sock() returns NULL, we dont release socket
> > lock.
>
> Hmm. I'm not seeing it. We're not even taking the socket lock there.
> Or is it hidden somehow?
>
> Linus
tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock()
{
newsk = tcp_create_openreq_child(sk, req, skb);
...
}
newsk is locked at this point.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists