[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1320257074.2292.23.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 19:04:34 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Simon Kirby <sim@...tway.ca>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc9
Le mercredi 02 novembre 2011 à 18:54 +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> The same applies for if (__inet_inherit_port(sk, newsk) < 0) a few
> lines further down, but that part was leaking the lock before that
> commit already.
>
Yes, but in normal condition, this never happened, this is why this
problem was never noticed.
tproxy is probaby very seldom used, and when used the error path is
probably never reached...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists