linux-kernel - [PATCH V2 for 3.2] fs/direct-io.c: Calculate fs_count correctly in get_more

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed,  2 Nov 2011 10:26:34 +0800
From:	Tao Ma <tm@....ma>
To:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH V2 for 3.2] fs/direct-io.c: Calculate fs_count correctly in get_more_blocks.

From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>

In get_more_blocks, we use dio_count to calculate fs_count to let the
file system map(maybe also create) blocks. And some tricky things are
done to increase fs_count if dio_count isn't aligned.

But actually it still has some cornor case that can't be coverd. See the
following example:
./dio_write foo -s 1024 -w 4096(direct write 4096 bytes at offset 1024).

In this case, the old calculation counts fs_count to be 1, but actually
we will write into 2 different blocks(if fs_blocksize=4096). So the
underlying file system is called twice and leads to some performance
overhead. So fix it by calculating fs_count correctly and let the file
system knows what we really want to write.

Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
---
 fs/direct-io.c |   11 ++++-------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
index d740ab6..5582183 100644
--- a/fs/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/direct-io.c
@@ -580,9 +580,8 @@ static int get_more_blocks(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio,
 {
 	int ret;
 	sector_t fs_startblk;	/* Into file, in filesystem-sized blocks */
+	sector_t fs_endblk;	/* Into file, in filesystem-sized blocks */
 	unsigned long fs_count;	/* Number of filesystem-sized blocks */
-	unsigned long dio_count;/* Number of dio_block-sized blocks */
-	unsigned long blkmask;
 	int create;
 
 	/*
@@ -593,11 +592,9 @@ static int get_more_blocks(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio,
 	if (ret == 0) {
 		BUG_ON(sdio->block_in_file >= sdio->final_block_in_request);
 		fs_startblk = sdio->block_in_file >> sdio->blkfactor;
-		dio_count = sdio->final_block_in_request - sdio->block_in_file;
-		fs_count = dio_count >> sdio->blkfactor;
-		blkmask = (1 << sdio->blkfactor) - 1;
-		if (dio_count & blkmask)	
-			fs_count++;
+		fs_endblk = (sdio->final_block_in_request - 1) >>
+				sdio->blkfactor;
+		fs_count = fs_endblk - fs_startblk + 1;
 
 		map_bh->b_state = 0;
 		map_bh->b_size = fs_count << dio->inode->i_blkbits;
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/