linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 01/34] msm: clock-pcom: Mark functions static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1320258991-22325-2-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Wed,  2 Nov 2011 11:35:58 -0700
From:	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
To:	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
	Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 01/34] msm: clock-pcom: Mark functions static

From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>

These functions are only used within clock-pcom.c, therefore mark
them as static.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-pcom.c |   18 +++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-pcom.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-pcom.c
index 63b7113..a52c970 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-pcom.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-pcom.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
 /*
  * glue for the proc_comm interface
  */
-int pc_clk_enable(unsigned id)
+static int pc_clk_enable(unsigned id)
 {
 	int rc = msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_ENABLE, &id, NULL);
 	if (rc < 0)
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ int pc_clk_enable(unsigned id)
 		return (int)id < 0 ? -EINVAL : 0;
 }
 
-void pc_clk_disable(unsigned id)
+static void pc_clk_disable(unsigned id)
 {
 	msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_DISABLE, &id, NULL);
 }
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ int pc_clk_reset(unsigned id, enum clk_reset_action action)
 		return (int)id < 0 ? -EINVAL : 0;
 }
 
-int pc_clk_set_rate(unsigned id, unsigned rate)
+static int pc_clk_set_rate(unsigned id, unsigned rate)
 {
 	/* The rate _might_ be rounded off to the nearest KHz value by the
 	 * remote function. So a return value of 0 doesn't necessarily mean
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ int pc_clk_set_rate(unsigned id, unsigned rate)
 		return (int)id < 0 ? -EINVAL : 0;
 }
 
-int pc_clk_set_min_rate(unsigned id, unsigned rate)
+static int pc_clk_set_min_rate(unsigned id, unsigned rate)
 {
 	int rc = msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_MIN_RATE, &id, &rate);
 	if (rc < 0)
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ int pc_clk_set_min_rate(unsigned id, unsigned rate)
 		return (int)id < 0 ? -EINVAL : 0;
 }
 
-int pc_clk_set_max_rate(unsigned id, unsigned rate)
+static int pc_clk_set_max_rate(unsigned id, unsigned rate)
 {
 	int rc = msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_MAX_RATE, &id, &rate);
 	if (rc < 0)
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ int pc_clk_set_max_rate(unsigned id, unsigned rate)
 		return (int)id < 0 ? -EINVAL : 0;
 }
 
-int pc_clk_set_flags(unsigned id, unsigned flags)
+static int pc_clk_set_flags(unsigned id, unsigned flags)
 {
 	int rc = msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_SET_FLAGS, &id, &flags);
 	if (rc < 0)
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ int pc_clk_set_flags(unsigned id, unsigned flags)
 		return (int)id < 0 ? -EINVAL : 0;
 }
 
-unsigned pc_clk_get_rate(unsigned id)
+static unsigned pc_clk_get_rate(unsigned id)
 {
 	if (msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_RATE, &id, NULL))
 		return 0;
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ unsigned pc_clk_get_rate(unsigned id)
 		return id;
 }
 
-unsigned pc_clk_is_enabled(unsigned id)
+static unsigned pc_clk_is_enabled(unsigned id)
 {
 	if (msm_proc_comm(PCOM_CLKCTL_RPC_ENABLED, &id, NULL))
 		return 0;
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ unsigned pc_clk_is_enabled(unsigned id)
 		return id;
 }
 
-long pc_clk_round_rate(unsigned id, unsigned rate)
+static long pc_clk_round_rate(unsigned id, unsigned rate)
 {
 
 	/* Not really supported; pc_clk_set_rate() does rounding on it's own. */
-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/