[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1320265849-5744-14-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:30:35 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
patches@...aro.org, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/28] rcu: Warn when rcu_read_lock() is used in extended quiescent state
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
We are currently able to detect uses of rcu_dereference_check() inside
extended quiescent states (such as the RCU-free window in idle).
But rcu_read_lock() and friends can be used without rcu_dereference(),
so that the earlier commit checking for use of rcu_dereference() and
friends while in RCU idle mode miss some error conditions. This commit
therefore adds extended quiescent state checking to rcu_read_lock() and
friends.
Uses of RCU from within RCU-idle mode are totally ignored by
RCU, hence the importance of these checks.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index bf91fcf..d201c15 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -237,21 +237,53 @@ static inline int rcu_is_cpu_idle(void)
}
#endif /* else !CONFIG_PROVE_RCU */
+static inline void rcu_lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *map)
+{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_is_cpu_idle());
+ lock_acquire(map, 0, 0, 2, 1, NULL, _THIS_IP_);
+}
+
+static inline void rcu_lock_release(struct lockdep_map *map)
+{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_is_cpu_idle());
+ lock_release(map, 1, _THIS_IP_);
+}
+
extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;
-# define rcu_read_acquire() \
- lock_acquire(&rcu_lock_map, 0, 0, 2, 1, NULL, _THIS_IP_)
-# define rcu_read_release() lock_release(&rcu_lock_map, 1, _THIS_IP_)
+
+static inline void rcu_read_acquire(void)
+{
+ rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_lock_map);
+}
+
+static inline void rcu_read_release(void)
+{
+ rcu_lock_release(&rcu_lock_map);
+}
extern struct lockdep_map rcu_bh_lock_map;
-# define rcu_read_acquire_bh() \
- lock_acquire(&rcu_bh_lock_map, 0, 0, 2, 1, NULL, _THIS_IP_)
-# define rcu_read_release_bh() lock_release(&rcu_bh_lock_map, 1, _THIS_IP_)
+
+static inline void rcu_read_acquire_bh(void)
+{
+ rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
+}
+
+static inline void rcu_read_release_bh(void)
+{
+ rcu_lock_release(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
+}
extern struct lockdep_map rcu_sched_lock_map;
-# define rcu_read_acquire_sched() \
- lock_acquire(&rcu_sched_lock_map, 0, 0, 2, 1, NULL, _THIS_IP_)
-# define rcu_read_release_sched() \
- lock_release(&rcu_sched_lock_map, 1, _THIS_IP_)
+
+static inline void rcu_read_acquire_sched(void)
+{
+ rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
+}
+
+static inline void rcu_read_release_sched(void)
+{
+ rcu_lock_release(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
+}
extern int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void);
--
1.7.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists