linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] Staging: hv: Move the mouse driver out of staging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1111022353530.20903@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date:	Wed, 2 Nov 2011 23:59:17 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
cc:	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
	jkosina@...e.cz, gregkh@...e.de, ohering@...e.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
	joe@...ches.com, devel@...uxdriverproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Staging: hv: Move the mouse driver out of staging

On Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Dan Carpenter wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:54:34AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > +			default:
> > > +				pr_err("unhandled packet type %d, tid %llx len %d\n",
> > > +				   desc->type,
> > > +				   req_id,
> > > +				   bytes_recvd);
> > 
> > Why not:
> > 
> >                                 pr_err("unhandled packet type %d, tid %llx 
> >                                        len %d\n", desc->type, req_id, bytes_recvd);
> 
> Because then the printk would be messed up?  Your final printed
> string would look like:
> 
> "unhandled packet type %d, tid %llx 
>                                        len %d\n"
> 
> Don't break strings up across lines because it breaks grep.  If K. Y.
> wants to put all the parameters on one line instead of three that
> would probably be better, but in the end who cares?
> 
Right, so I obviously "fat fingered" that and should have read my email 
once more before sending. *But* the point really was just the "put all the 
parameters on one line rather than 3" bit...

As for who cares; well, I cared enough to actually read the patch and send 
a reply, and I thought we needed more reviewers... When I review something 
I comment on everything I spot from bugs to trivial stuff - then it is 
up to the recipient to pick the things they want to address from the 
reply..

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>       http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/