[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111102232403.GO31337@atomide.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:24:03 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add back alignment for size for __alloc_skb
* Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> [111102 15:46]:
> On 03/11/2011 00:19, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> > * David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> [111102 15:42]:
> >> c>
> >>> The issue is calculation of skb->end, which is based upon calculated
> >>> 'size' variable.
> >>>
> >>> skb->end determines alignment of skb_shared_info, which is where the
> >>> alignment problem is occuring for Tony.
> >>
> >> Right, and SMP_CACHE_BYTES setting should save us in any case.
> >>
> >> For ARM, SMP_CACHE_BYTES seems to be set to L1_CACHE_BYTES which in
> >> turn is set via ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT which can be set seemingly to any
> >> value but the defaults are 5 and 6 which should be OK.
> >>
> >> So unless Tony is using a non-standard setting of ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT,
> >> this report is a bit mysterious.
> >
> > This is happening at least with omap1_defconfig. In that case we have
> > ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT=5.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Tony
>
>
> Do you use SLOB, SLUB or SLAB ?
Seems to be SLOB for omap1_defconfig.
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists