[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzbNxTn83DdQd9cVpDujNYEdEP0Aimv5k1hCD0ebTDzcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 19:31:00 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Shawn Pearce <spearce@...arce.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com>, git@...r.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git patches] libata updates, GPG signed (but see admin notes)
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Shawn Pearce <spearce@...arce.org> wrote:
>
> <rant>
I'm answering this separately, because it's a separate rant.
It's also totally bogus, but whatever.
> Get over it. Add the fucking empty commit to show the flow of a
> change. Stop forcing every fucking contributor to rebase/rewrite his
> commits just so someone higher up in the food chain can wank with
> their SOB line.
Shawn, stop using whatever drugs you are using.
NOBODY EVER REBASES ANYTHING FOR SIGNED-OFF-BY.
If they do, they are doing things very very wrong.
Signed-off-by: is *purely* for sending patches by email. No git
operations involved. None. Nada. Zilch. No rebasing involved, because
there's not even a git repository involved, for chissake!
Once something is in git, it's not signed off on - there should be a
sign-off-chain from the author to the committer, and that's it.
Anything else would be crazy.
So stop the crazy rants. Stop with the bad drugs. Seriously. You're
acting crazy.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists