linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3 of 5] virtio: support unlocked queue kick

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111103075211.GD6993@infradead.org>
Date:	Thu, 3 Nov 2011 03:52:11 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	MichaelS.Tsirkist@...hat.com,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3 of 5] virtio: support unlocked queue kick

On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 06:12:51PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Based on patch by Christoph for virtio_blk speedup:

Please credit it to Stefan - he also sent a pointer to his original
version in reply to the previous thread.

Also shouldn't virtqueue_kick have kerneldoc comments?


I also notices that you documented the functions bother here and in
the first patch in the headers.  At least historically the kerneldoc
tools didn't parse comments at declarations, but only at the function
defintions.  Did you check these actually get picked up?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/