[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOS58YNNx7XOGov19_hucAQYvw88F2YO+KoVpn8uD+COgJRbEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 07:41:43 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: add hooks for host runtime power management
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com> wrote:
>> Yes, it is a problem. But it looks like the underlying issue is that
>> you're using the SCSI error handler to do something it was not intended
>> for. Can't you suspend and resume the ATA port without using the error
>> handler?
>
> The system suspend and resume of the ATA port uses the error handler.
> I think the runtime suspend and resume should use the error handler too.
>
> Tejun,
>
> Could you comment more on this?
I don't know. I haven't really thought about it but as it's currently
designed, I don't think it'll be possible to avoid going through EH to
put ATA ports into suspend mode.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists