[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1320333244.3681.22.camel@js-netbook>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:14:04 -0400
From: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: Avoid selecting mult values that might
overflow when adjusted
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 15:52 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, John Stultz wrote:
> > > Oh, and the other bit is that not all clocksources have been converted
> > > over to using clocksource_register_hz/khz, so some may be using very
> > > small shift values, which could more easily hit large % mult adjustment
> > > (due to the resulting coarseness of each integer change) that wouldn't
> > > cause overflows.
> >
> > Fair enough. I'm queuing it.
>
> That want's a cc stable as well, right ?
Good point. Yes.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists