[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOS58YN1WByGtr1MNH12vbPVa-vyWa-LiHYgMWSJt1WbfK-vtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 08:51:46 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: add hooks for host runtime power management
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> I don't know. I haven't really thought about it but as it's currently
>> designed, I don't think it'll be possible to avoid going through EH to
>> put ATA ports into suspend mode.
>
> Why not?
It's just how things are designed now. There's no reason why it's
fundamentally impossible but going around that would require some
amount of hackery or preferably re-design. Synchronization against
command processing, interrupts and all are built around EH.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists