linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] new cgroup controller "fork"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Nov 2011 18:31:23 +0100
From:	richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:	Max Kellermann <mk@...all.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, max@...mpel.org,
	menage@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new cgroup controller "fork"

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Max Kellermann <mk@...all.com> wrote:
> +struct cgroup_fork {
> +       struct cgroup_subsys_state css;
> +
> +       /** protect the "remaining" attribute */
> +       spinlock_t lock;
> +
> +       /**
> +        * The remaining number of forks allowed.  -1 is the magic
> +        * value for "unlimited".
> +        */
> +       int remaining;
> +};

Wouldn't an atomic_t also do it?

-- 
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/