linux-kernel - Re: sb_edac 32-bit compile fail due to 64-bit divide

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EB2D260.7070807@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:41:52 -0200
From:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
To:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
	"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sb_edac 32-bit compile fail due to 64-bit divide

Em 03-11-2011 14:31, Luck, Tony escreveu:
>>> Of course, an interim fix would be to make it depend on CONFIG_64BIT or CONFIG_X86_64.
>>
>> That would work I guess.  It's up to you.
> 
> Typically the test platforms I get have pretty much the minimum sane memory
> configuration - my Sandy Bridge EP machine came with 32GB of memory (which
> is theoretically bootable with a 32-bit kernel, but really isn't going to
> be much fun to use).  So I would think that time could be spent on more
> productive things than making this edac driver work on 32-bit.  My vote
> is for the "depends on 64-bit" solution.

Works for me. It would be a trivial patch. We can later fix it for 32 bits, if
someone has any usage for it with 32 bits kernels.

Thanks,
Mauro.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/