linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] UML changes for 3.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EB3045A.6050501@nod.at>
Date:	Thu, 03 Nov 2011 22:15:06 +0100
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
CC:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Foley <pefoley2@...izon.net>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] UML changes for 3.2

Am 03.11.2011 22:01, schrieb Paul Bolle:
> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 21:41 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> 1) Note that running make update-po-config seems to do what it's
>> supposed to do. But it also prints this warning
>>     arch/um/Kconfig.common:66:warning: environment variable SUBARCH undefined

I'm confused. What is "make update-po-config" supposed to do?
It seems to iterate over all archs and reads their Kconfig, right?

>> (I haven't checked if it's new.) It seems harmless. I don't know what
>> should be done to make it go away.
> 2) Should I submit one (or two?) patch(es) to fix these minor issues?

I would send one patch.

Thanks,
//richard


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)