linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Let panel power sequencing hardware do its job

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yunlirwrhkw.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
Date:	Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:01:35 -0700
From:	Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
To:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc:	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Let panel power sequencing hardware do its job

On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 12:57:08 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> wrote:

> Modulo what we already discussed on irc about the PP_READY bit, and the

Right, the PP_READY bit requires that everything needed for PCH eDP be
running, even when you're using a CPU connected eDP panel, and so it's
not actually useful.

> CodingStyle nitpicks (newlines before {?  come on, this isn't X :),

Ok, I can fix that at least, even if I think it's ugly in kernel style.

I'll clean up the style and attach your R-b.

-- 
keith.packard@...el.com

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped