[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <A2505FE2-FE28-4C23-879E-357C9D3AA03F@cam.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 23:25:12 +0000
From: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc: Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Unix Support <unix-support@....cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: CIFS: Rename bug on servers not supporting inode numbers
Hi,
On 3 Nov 2011, at 17:40, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 15:42:13 +0000 Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>> I should add that we are using iocharset=utf8 mount option which means that the dcache hash/compare functions done in the cifs module do not work because it uses nls_tolower() and nls_strnicmp() both of which for utf8 NLS in the kernel do not do anything at all and effectively behave case sensitively!
>>
>> Thus this bug/problem in all likelyhood only affects utf8 iocharset users on a case-insensitive but case-preserving CIFS server that does not support server inode numbers.
>>
>> That probably explains why it has not been noticed before!
>>
>> We need utf8 thus we still need to fix this issue.
> I'm confused...
>
> If the filesystem being served out by the server is using utf8, then
> how is it handling the case-insensitivity?
The file system being served is NSS (the Netware one but now mounted on Open Enterprise Server with Linux kernel rather than actual Netware kernel). No idea how it works I am afraid. It supports lots of different namespaces as well as being case-insensitive and case preserving when using the LONG name space (which is now being served through CIFS).
If it was NTFS or exFAT I could tell you exactly how they work (each volume has an upcase table mapping the 65536 UCS-2 Unicode characters to their upper case equivalents and each 16-bit character is upper-cased individually, more recently Windows has switched to using UTF-16 instead of UCS-2 and the upcase table changed when that happened though it remained the same size and I think for file system purposes the fact that there are surrogates in the above UCS-2 Unicode range is simply ignored)...
Best regards,
Anton
--
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer, http://www.linux-ntfs.org/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists