lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EB32D1B.8060305@fb.com>
Date:	Thu, 3 Nov 2011 17:08:59 -0700
From:	Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
To:	Andrew Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	<devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf: teach perf inject to merge sched_stat_* and
 sched_switch events

On 11/2/11 3:59 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote:

> +		event_sw = (union perf_event *)&ent->header;

This causes problems with -Wstrict-aliasing=3.

I noticed that the suggested cmdline is:

perf script record sched-stat -- -e sched:sched_stat_sleep

I'd much prefer something along the lines of:

perf script record sched-stat -e <events> -- sleep 1

Also, the perf inject command is a bit unforgiving when the user makes 
some mistakes (eg: didn't specify -e sched:sched_stat_sleep). The 
failure mode is hard to understand (perf report -i perf.data.d fails 
with "no samples").

Doing it directly:

# perf record -ag -e sched:sched_switch --filter "prev_state == 1 || 
prev_state == 2" -e 
sched:sched_process_exit,sched:sched_stat_sleep,sched:sched_stat_iowait 
-- sleep 1
# perf inject -v -s -i perf.data -o perf.data.d

results in a whole bunch of:

Could not find sched_switch for pid 16188
Could not find sched_switch for pid 16212
Could not find sched_switch for pid 1500
Could not find sched_switch for pid 16195
Could not find sched_switch for pid 16179

I think this is the same issue you referenced in "Known issues".

Although I'm able to get some profiling info out of perf.data.d, the 
process I really wanted to trace got zero samples.

  -Arun

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ