[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k47grx7q.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 21:06:09 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3 of 5] virtio: support unlocked queue kick
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 03:52:11 -0400, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 06:12:51PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Based on patch by Christoph for virtio_blk speedup:
>
> Please credit it to Stefan - he also sent a pointer to his original
> version in reply to the previous thread.
>
> Also shouldn't virtqueue_kick have kerneldoc comments?
Yep, and I've credited it properly.
> I also notices that you documented the functions bother here and in
> the first patch in the headers. At least historically the kerneldoc
> tools didn't parse comments at declarations, but only at the function
> defintions. Did you check these actually get picked up?
Gah, I'd forgotten that the kernel tendency is to put the interface
documentation next to the implementation.
Personally, I think extracting it is insane, but I've moved them.
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists