[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EB3F9CE.1050407@siemens.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:42:22 +0100
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/GIT PULL] Linux KVM tool for v3.2
On 2011-11-04 14:32, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> I know you don't see the benefits of integrated code base but I as a
> developer do.
IIRC, this discussion still lacks striking, concrete examples from the
KVM tool vs. QEMU development processes.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists