linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: TPS65910: Improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A90195CA@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
Date:	Fri, 4 Nov 2011 15:43:40 +0000
From:	"Mohammed, Afzal" <afzal@...com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Girdwood, Liam" <lrg@...com>,
	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: TPS65910: Improvements

Hi Mark,

On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 20:54:11, Mark Brown wrote:
> ...should be in two separate commits.

Ok

> 
> > 2. struct tps65910_platform_data usage can be avoided
> >  by making use of struct tps65910_board to simplify
> >  driver. Hence remove it
> 
> Why is this a simplification?  Note that one of the reasons platform
> data is kept separate from any runtime data the device needs is that it
> makes the configuration available easier to see and understand.
> 

Ok, I understand that this simplification should not be done.

Regards
Afzal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/