[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF173F9A4E4F@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:43:57 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
To: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
CC: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 7/8] arm/tegra: implement support for tegra30
Peter De Schrijver wrote at Wednesday, November 02, 2011 8:09 AM:
> Add support for tegra30 SoC. This includes a device tree compatible type for
> this SoC ("nvidia,tegra30") and adds L2 cache initialization for this new SoC.
> The clock framework is still missing, which prevents most drivers from working.
...
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig
...
> @@ -17,7 +14,18 @@ config ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC
> Support for NVIDIA Tegra AP20 and T20 processors, based on the
> ARM CortexA9MP CPU and the ARM PL310 L2 cache controller
>
> -endchoice
> +config ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC
Wasn't that config option already used earlier in the series, e.g. in
[PATCH v2 6/8] arm/tegra: pinmux tables and definitions for tegra30.
Should this patch be pushed earlier so it isn't used before it's created?
I'm not sure how much that matters.
--
nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists