[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111104212910.GB8266@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 21:29:10 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
patches@...aro.org, tony@...mide.com,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, lrg@...com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] regulator: helper routine to extract
regulator_init_data
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 02:22:16PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 09:14:48PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > The name will be fixed by the individual device bindings, this is
> > specifying the general form of a supply property. Each device binding
> > will define the set of supplies that the device can use.
> Ah, ok. It shouldn't be a part of this binding then and instead be added
> to the bindings for the consumers.
I think it's useful to define how consumers are supposed to do this
somewhere - it is actually part of the core binding how consumers are
supposed to do this.
There's also a bit of magic here for chained supplies with one regulator
supplying another (eg, using a DCDC to drop the system supply down to a
lower voltage to supply a bunch of LDOs for improved efficiency).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists