[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EB3549D.5090404@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 10:57:33 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tim Hockin <thockin@...kin.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Aditya Kali <adityakali@...gle.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] cgroups: Task counter subsystem v6
>>> There may be other ways to cobble this sort of safety together, but
>>> they are less appealing for various reasons. cgroups are how we
>>> control groups of related pids.
>>>
>>> I'd really love to be able to use this.
>>
>> Has it been confirmed that this implementation actually solves the
>> problem? ie: tested a bit?
>>
>> btw, Frederic told me that this version of the patchset had some
>> serious problem so it's on hold pending an upgrade, regardless of other
>> matters.
>
> Yep. The particular issue is https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/10/13/532
>
> Li Zefan proposed a fix (https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/10/17/26) which I'm
> currently reworking.
>
We really need to coordinate cgroup patches. I mean, the patchset+fix conflict
with Tejun's work, and the conflict is not trivial.
> But then I'd love it if you can test this subsystem to see if it really matches
> your needs, Tim.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists