lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EB39E63.9020804@kernel.dk>
Date:	Fri, 04 Nov 2011 09:12:19 +0100
From:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-next] block: don't call blk_drain_queue() if
 elevator is not up

On 2011-11-03 22:12, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 06:49:53PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> Fix it by making blk_cleanup_queue() check whether q->elevator is set
>>> up before invoking blk_drain_queue.
>>
>> Thanks, glad this got caught before the merge...
> 
> Heh, yeah, definitely, and just to be paranoid, this whole thing is
> for the next merge window.

Ehm, what parts? If the bug is in for-next, things are queued up for
_this_ merge window.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ