[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EB39E63.9020804@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 09:12:19 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-next] block: don't call blk_drain_queue() if
elevator is not up
On 2011-11-03 22:12, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 06:49:53PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> Fix it by making blk_cleanup_queue() check whether q->elevator is set
>>> up before invoking blk_drain_queue.
>>
>> Thanks, glad this got caught before the merge...
>
> Heh, yeah, definitely, and just to be paranoid, this whole thing is
> for the next merge window.
Ehm, what parts? If the bug is in for-next, things are queued up for
_this_ merge window.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists