[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzxmDC407EDcm8MV55R7BnRhuxuTOyhZ-jyg2q39=NKfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 17:53:30 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <junio@...ox.com>
Cc: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Shawn Pearce <spearce@...arce.org>,
git@...r.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git patches] libata updates, GPG signed (but see admin notes)
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Junio C Hamano <junio@...ox.com> wrote:
>
> You do not have to resort to NUL; we could just stuff whatever you do not
> need to see but needs to be left *intact* in the new header fields just
> like the embedded GPG signatures are stored in signed commits.
Agreed, [ details removed ] that sounds perfect. And makes it easy to
get at if you want to with just "git cat-file commit" - without ever
really being visible to people who don't care. And having it visible
in the editor with '#' means that the user who does the merge gets to
see what actually ended up being put in there, along with the fact
that yes, it verified correctly.
So I think I really like that approach - it seems to solve all problems.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists