linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: Add wrapper script around QEMU to test kernels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EB65C5B.8070709@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:07:23 +0200
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
CC:	Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org list" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	qemu-devel Developers <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Add wrapper script around QEMU to test kernels

On 11/06/2011 12:04 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de> wrote:
> > On LinuxCon I had a nice chat with Linus on what he thinks kvm-tool
> > would be doing and what he expects from it. Basically he wants a
> > small and simple tool he and other developers can run to try out and
> > see if the kernel they just built actually works.
> >
> > Fortunately, QEMU can do that today already! The only piece that was
> > missing was the "simple" piece of the equation, so here is a script
> > that wraps around QEMU and executes a kernel you just built.
>
> I'm happy to see some real competition for the KVM tool in usability. ;-)
>
> That said, while the script looks really useful for developers,
> wouldn't it make more sense to put it in QEMU to make sure it's kept
> up-to-date and distributions can pick it up too? (And yes, I realize
> the irony here.)

Why would distributions want it?  It's only useful for kernel developers.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/