[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO+b5-p0gLueksp7a8RVm9A1Qe_9xc-fNSNX0NY0W7CNtGnSYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 14:20:47 +0100
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ib_srpt: Initial SRP Target merge for v3.2-rc1
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
<nab@...ux-iscsi.org> wrote:
> We have also discussed srpt_service_guid a bit before, which you
> indicated needed to stay in current code as global scope, and presumably
> should not change value after loading. Looking at the actual usage, one
> post merge improvement we can consider is seeing if it's possible to
> move ib_cm_listen() out of srpt_add_one() and have it driven instead by
> configfs context in order to optionally set srpt_service_guid on a per
> target endpoint basis to get us some more flexibility.
ib_sprt defines a single I/O controller profile and hence there should
be exactly one GUID associated with it.
> For the "last WQE" you've mentioned, I'm happy to accept a patch to
> address this as you know the code better than me. Otherwise, I'll be
> digging this out of your out-of-tree code as a seperate item and
> figuring out how to reproduce and test this special case.
I'll post a patch to address last WQE handling.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists