[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLEkYYoSrjjkCwiJ7MSdrUUQCf_Ewb8S6kFMBaEq5cNmQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:57:47 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org list" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
qemu-devel Developers <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@...il.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Add wrapper script around QEMU to test kernels
On 11/07/2011 09:45 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>> Specifications matter much more than working code. Quirks are a fact
>>> of life but should always come second.
>>
>> To quote Linus:
>>
>> And I have seen _lots_ of total crap work that was based on specs. It's
>> _the_ single worst way to write software, because it by definition means
>> that the software was written to match theory, not reality.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
> All generalizations are false.
What is that supposed to mean? You claimed we're "doing it wrong" and
I explained you why we are doing it the way we are.
Really, the way we do things in the KVM tool is not a bug, it's a feature.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists