linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MTD: MAPS: bcm963xx-flash.c: explicitly include module.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOiHx=mmLrfqtp3Nm4WgUT9Vu8pYnVht7tBvwguGMN91bj0Dig@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:12:00 +0100
From:	Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>
To:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc:	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MTD: MAPS: bcm963xx-flash.c: explicitly include module.h

HI Paul,

On 7 November 2011 02:26, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
>On 06/11/2011 (Sun 12:57) Jonas Gorski wrote:
>> This patch is based on next-20111104 and probably should go through Paul's module.h cleanup tree.
>
> I can put it in the module.h tree, but for files that are using module.h
> stuff, they can simply add it via the normal maintainer flow, since
> files that use modular stuff should include module.h regardless and
> there are no dependencies on the module.h content for things like this.

I'm fine with either (though going through the MTD-tree will probably
warrant a resubmission with a shortened changelog as it doesn't break
there (yet)).

@David, any preference there? Should I resubmit?

Regards
Jonas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/