| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 12:30:56 +0200 From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com> To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org list" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, qemu-devel Developers <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@...il.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] KVM: Add wrapper script around QEMU to test kernels On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> It's not just about code, it's as much about culture and development process. > > Indeed. The BSDs have both kernel and the base system in a single > repository. There are probably good reasons for (and against) it. > > In Linux we don't have that culture. No tool (except perf) lives in the > kernel repo. I fail to see why kvm-tool is that much different from > udev, util-linux, iproute, filesystem tools, that it should be included. tools/power was merged in just 2 versions ago, do you think that merging that was a mistake? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists