[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+1xoqfXq++t9YzqDQH60oLDkWhyvEJsC6QWJ1gx8ikQA=eAhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 12:30:56 +0200
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org list" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
qemu-devel Developers <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@...il.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] KVM: Add wrapper script around QEMU to test kernels
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> It's not just about code, it's as much about culture and development process.
>
> Indeed. The BSDs have both kernel and the base system in a single
> repository. There are probably good reasons for (and against) it.
>
> In Linux we don't have that culture. No tool (except perf) lives in the
> kernel repo. I fail to see why kvm-tool is that much different from
> udev, util-linux, iproute, filesystem tools, that it should be included.
tools/power was merged in just 2 versions ago, do you think that
merging that was a mistake?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists