[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EB7CCA9.7010507@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:18:49 +0100
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@...il.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org list" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
qemu-devel Developers <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Add wrapper script around QEMU to test kernels
On 11/07/11 12:44, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Indeed I do not see any advantage, since all the interfaces they use are
>> stable anyway (sysfs, msr.ko).
>>
>> If they had gone in x86info, for example, my distro (F16, not exactly
>> conservative) would have likely picked those tools up already, but it
>> didn't.
>
> Distributing userspace tools in the kernel tree is a relatively new
> concept so it's not at all surprising distributions don't pick them up
> as quickly. That doesn't mean it's a fundamentally flawed approach,
> though.
tools/ lacks a separation into "kernel hacker's testing+debugging
toolbox" and "userspace tools". It lacks proper buildsystem integration
for the userspace tools, there is no "make tools" and also no "make
tools_install". Silently dropping new stuff into tools/ and expecting
the world magically noticing isn't going to work.
cheers,
Gerd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists