[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLGuRtWHbOugqHoxCNDmCrtiLFh7xMo8BVGNprG3GoanOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:42:57 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org list" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
qemu-devel Developers <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Add wrapper script around QEMU to test kernels
Hi Ted,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> And the same problems will exist with kvm-tool. What if you need to
> release a new version of kvm-tool? Does that mean that you have to
> release a new set of kernel binaries? It's a mess, and there's a
> reason why we don't have glibc, e2fsprogs, xfsprogs, util-linux-ng,
> etc., all packaged into the kernel sources.
If we need to release a new version, patches would go through the
-stable tree just like with any other subsystem.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> Because it's a stupid, idiotic thing to do.
The discussion is turning into whether or not linux/tools makes sense
or not. I wish you guys would have had it before perf was merged to
the tree.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists