[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111107151939.GA24234@thunk.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:19:39 -0500
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: fix NULL pointer dereference from orig_data
in fill_super and remount.
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:01:51PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> Fix NULL pointer dereference from orig_data in fill_super and remount.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Um, did you even try to test this patch before submitting it?
#1: kstrdup() return NULL if data is NULL
#2: The kernel's printk and sprintf functions will translate
sprintf(buf, "%s", NULL) by filling in the string "NULL"
#3: The only use of orig_data is a cosmetic one, of printing out
the mount options which are passed in.
#4: If the user doesn't specify any mount options, data is NULL, and
your patch would cause those mounts to fail with ENOMEM.
In summary, there is no problem here; a pendant might complain that
it's possible for data to be non-NULL, and for orig_data to be null of
the kstrdup failed, but in that case, other memory allocations done
later in ext4_fill_super() will almost have certainly failed, so in
practice won't get as far as the printk.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists