[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111107155453.GJ8670@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 17:54:53 +0200
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com, mtosatti@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
acme@...stprotocols.net
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 7/9] KVM: Expose the architectural performance
monitoring CPUID leaf
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 04:45:57PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 17:41 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > + entry->eax = min(cap.version, 2)
> > > > + | (cap.num_counters_gp << 8)
> > > > + | (cap.bit_width_gp << 16)
> > > > + | (cap.events_mask_len << 24);
>
>
> > Do you mean by doing cpuid here directly instead of checking perf
> > capability?
>
> No I meant something like:
>
> union cpuid10_eax eax;
>
> eax.version = min(cap.version, 2);
> eax.bit_width = cap.bit_width;
> eax.num_counters = cap.num_counters;
> eax.mask_length = cap.mask_length;
>
> entry->eax = eax.full;
>
Ah, yes. Will do that.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists