linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/49] MIPS: irq: Remove IRQF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111107134912.0878664493f1110ceefb98a6@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Mon, 7 Nov 2011 13:49:12 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Cc:	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/49] MIPS: irq: Remove IRQF_DISABLED

Hi Yong,

On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:10:48 +0800 Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 12:21:06PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > Thanks, queued for 3.3.  I resolved a conflict in dbdma.c and remove
> > one IRQF_DISABLED which had been missed in arch/mips/kernel/perf_event.c.
> 
> And FYI, my patch is based on next-20111014 when I made it.

You should never base anything on top of a linux-next tree.  You should
use the tree you are fixing (Linus' or the Mips tree or ...) as the base.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped