linux-kernel - Re: PROBLEM: Race condition in tty buffer's function flush_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Nov 2011 18:39:50 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Ilya Zykov <ilya@...x.ru>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Race condition in tty buffer's function
 flush_to_ldisc().

> Nested call flush_to_ldisc() happened on different CPU only. It happens because
> one side pty call "schedule_work(&tty->buf.work)" on one CPU from "tty_flip_buffer_push()",
> the other side call "schedule_work(&tty->buf.work)" from n_tty's layer from "n_tty_set_room()"
> on different CPU. It also can happen in interrupt if interrupt handle on 
> different CPU. Schedule_work() schedule work on CPU which was called(IMHO).

But the two sides are different ttys so that specific case shouldn't
matter.

Something is clearly happening because you trigger the trace but I don't
see why the paths you indicate cause it ? If you make mthread a cpu
struct variable and add a WARN_ON(1) in the error case do you get any
useful traces ?

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/