linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] x86, efi: Calling __pa() with an ioremap'd address is invalid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EB84734.3070006@zytor.com>
Date:	Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:01:40 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
CC:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Huang Ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86, efi: Calling __pa() with an ioremap'd address
 is invalid

On 11/07/2011 12:58 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> 
>> However, "EFI stub in the kernel" doesn't mean "can't use an external
>> bootloader."
> 
> Agreed. It just means that we're still plausibly going to need some 
> handshaking between them. Alternatively, as long as the bootloader 
> passes us the memory map, we can just ignore any E820 map it gives us 
> anyway.
> 

I know we need to be able to pass the initramfs in memory; anything else
we need other than the normal EFI executable entry conditions?

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/