lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPXgP118CzaTuV-kABfEC-D-+K75zdKVwbaYba+FuN7umJO4kA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 7 Nov 2011 23:37:56 +0100
From:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	mzxreary@...inter.de, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, dave@....org,
	hch@...radead.org, hughd@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tmpfs: support user quotas

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 23:15, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> (11/7/2011 6:30 AM), Lennart Poettering wrote:

> If you want per-user limitation, RLIMIT is bad idea. RLIMIT is only inherited
> by fork. So, The api semantics clearly mismatch your usecase.

Like RLIMIT_NPROC?

> Instead, I suggest to implement new sysfs knob.

Where would users show up in sysfs?

Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ