linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: Add wrapper script around QEMU to test kernels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EB6DC92.6010105@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 06 Nov 2011 20:14:26 +0100
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Add wrapper script around QEMU to test kernels

On 11/06/2011 07:05 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> I mean, seriously, git makes it so easy to have a separate tree that
>> >  it almost doesn't make sense not to have one. You're constantly
>> >  working in separate trees yourself because every one of your
>> >  branches is separate. Keeping in sync with the kernel release cycles
>> >  (which I don't think makes any sense for you) should be easy enough
>> >  too by merely releasing in sync with the kernel tree...
> We'd be the only subsystem doing that!

GStreamer (V4L), RTSAdmin (LIO target), sg3_utils, trousers all are out 
of tree, and nobody of their authors is even thinking of doing all this 
brouhaha to get merged into Linus's tree.

Paolo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/