linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: Add wrapper script around QEMU to test kernels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOJsxLFion2F+EGM6rYVPG4PdDtH74aozRx_kUOu3GDYhRpong@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:13:49 +0200
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:	Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org list" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	qemu-devel Developers <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@...il.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Add wrapper script around QEMU to test kernels

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
> (BTW, I'm also convinced like Ted that not having a defined perf ABI might
> have made sense in the beginning, but it has now devolved into bad software
> engineering practice).

I'm not a perf maintainer so I don't know what the situation with wrt.
ABI breakage is. Your or Ted's comments don't match my assumptions or
experience, though.

                        Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/