[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EB8DB84.6070300@hitachi.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:34:28 +0900
From: HAYASAKA Mitsuo <mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@...achi.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] x86: check stack overflows more reliably
Hi Pekka,
Thank you for your comments.
(2011/11/07 16:00), Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Mitsuo Hayasaka
> <mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@...achi.com> wrote:
>> (2) check stack overflow in detail
>> Currently, only kernel stack is checked for the overflow,
>> which is not sufficient for enterprise systems. To enhance
>> reliability, expand stack overflow checking to IRQ and
>> exception stacks optionally. This is disabled by default
>> in Kconfig.
>
> This sounds useful. What's the reason for not enabling this by
> default? Performance regressions?
I'm worried about performance regressions because this patch checks
a stack overflow in detail.
However, I guess there is no problem for enabling it by default
since this option is for debug and appears only if a DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
option is enabled.
So, I'd like to send the revised patch if it does not have any further problem.
> Pekka
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists