[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1111081327350.18135@tux.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:29:46 +0200 (EET)
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org list" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
qemu-devel Developers <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@...il.com>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [F.A.Q.] perf ABI backwards and forwards compatibility
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Theodore Tso wrote:
>> We have the staging tree because it's a widely acknowledged belief that
>> kernel code in the tree tends to improve over time compared to code
>> that's sitting out of the tree. Are you disputing that belief?
>
> Kernel code in the kernel source tree improves; because that's where it
> will eventually end up --- linked against the kernel.
>
> There are all sorts of dynamics in play that don't necessarily apply to
> userspace code.
>
> Otherwise we could just link in all of the userspace code in a Linux
> distribution and magically expect it will get better, eh? Not!
You just yourself said it's about the people. Why do you now think it's
about linking against the kernel? I know I have hacked on various parts of
the kernel that I have never linked to my kernel.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists