[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111108115153.GU29978@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:51:53 +0200
From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
CC: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Add support for tegra30 and cardhu
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:45:59PM +0100, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 08:10:29PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > Peter De Schrijver wrote at Monday, November 07, 2011 7:20 AM:
> > > This patchset adds support for the tegra30 SoC and the cardhu development
> > > board.
> > >
> > > Pathset is on top of Will Deacon's ARM reset work.
> >
> > A few minor issues:
> >
> > 1) If I enable just ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC, but not ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC, the
> > kernel fails to build because arch/arm/mach-tegra/include/mach/irqs.h
> > only defines NR_IRQS if ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC is defined.
> >
> > 2) All the Tegra20 boards don't depend on ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC, so they can
> > be enabled even if only Tegra30 support is enabled.
> >
>
> Indeed. I also noticed that MACH_VENTANA lacks select MACH_SEABOARD...
I take that back. It's not needed.
> Maybe I should submit a seperate patch to fix all this?
>
I will make a patch to cleanup the ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC dependencies. Or do you
want this as part of the tegra30/cardhu series?
Cheers,
Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists