[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLE5PxhqC5DfHOqgoSXbUOPcHZUKL5QUSGL1fuEkYp26YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:26:03 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org list" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
qemu-devel Developers <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
"Am?rico Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Add wrapper script around QEMU to test kernels
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> Nevermind that running virtfs as a rootfs is a really dumb idea. You
> do now want to run a VM that has a rootfs that gets changed all the
> time behind your back.
It's rootfs binaries that are shared, not configuration. It's
unfortunate but works OK for the single user use case it's meant for.
It's obviously not a proper solution for the generic case. We were
hoping that we could use something like overlayfs to hide the issue
under the rug. Do you think that's also a really dumb thing to do?
Using block device snapshotting would be interesting and we should
definitely look into that.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists